See the 1961 Supreme Court cases McGowan v. Since it unfairly privileged or prejudiced one religion versus another, it wasn't a neutral law of general applicability.įurthermore, one of the activists quoted in the article says that she opposes abortion bans because she considers it imposing Christian morality on non-Christians. City of Hialeah (1993), which struck down a Florida city's law that banned ritual animal sacrifice while leaving a specific exemption for kosher slaughter. This standard was used several years later in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. The court ruled that a state may limit a religious activity as long as the law is a "neutral law of general applicability"-in other words, if it's written and enforced in a way that fairly applies in all relevant circumstances, religious or secular. Smith (1990), about whether the state of Oregon had the right to penalize an employee who used peyote as part of a sincerely held religious belief. See the Supreme Court case Employment Division v. Please visit the wiki for the complete list. No one comes to the Father except through me." - John 14:6Ĭome chat with us on IRC /#reddit-Christianity /#reddit-Christianity-meta Religious/Denominational Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. If you are asking a question, be sure to check our FAQ as it may have already been addressed there. Our Community Policy (XP for short) contains guidelines to help promote healthy discussion and discourage trolling, please review it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |